Earthquakes, volcanoes, storms, energy, mining and space

Home » The Rise of Citizen Science Databases: From iNaturalist to GBIF

GBIF Turns 25: The Open Database Behind Biodiversity Science Worldwide

By

–

The Rise of Citizen Science Databases: From iNaturalist to GBIF

Twenty-Five Years of Open Records

The Global Biodiversity Information Facility, GBIF to its users, marked its 25th anniversary in 2026 as the quiet backbone of biodiversity science. It was established in 2001 on the recommendation of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Megascience Forum, which had concluded that “an international mechanism is needed to make biodiversity data and information accessible worldwide”. The problem it answered dated to the 1992 Rio Earth Summit: knowledge of the world’s species sat scattered through a small club of institutions, concentrated in rich countries and with no joint route to pool it for the newly signed Convention on Biological Diversity. Twenty-one founding countries signed on. Today the network counts 70 participating countries, with data providers spread across more than 120, and more than 3.8 billion biodiversity records now sit in open access.

The Network Effect

GBIF operates as a federation rather than a warehouse. Its work runs through 47 voting countries plus 42 organisational participants, each with a national or thematic node that mobilises records and builds local capacity. More than 2,700 institutions have published through the network, natural history museums, universities, agencies, citizen-science platforms and a growing roster of companies among them, bringing the total to nearly 3500 organisations and adding new publishers at a pace of more than two every three days. The payoff shows up in the literature: GBIF-mediated data now prop an average of eight fresh peer-reviewed papers each day and have fed more than 15,000 publications to date. An independent 2023 assessment put the return at roughly 12 euros in societal benefit for every euro invested, with researcher time savings alone worth 35 million euros a year.

What the Numbers Say

A year earlier, the network’s Swedish node offered its own snapshot for the International Day for Biological Diversity: 3.1 billion species occurrence records at that point, with data flowing in at 13.6 records per second through 2024, 113,854 datasets from 2,476 institutions, sharing from 146 countries and areas through 53 national portals, and 12,952 peer-reviewed papers built on GBIF-mediated data, six-plus every day. Downloads averaged 267.6 billion records a month in early 2025. Executive Secretary Dr. Joe Miller, marking the anniversary, said the milestone publication “represents the past, present and future of GBIF.” He added that “I believe the paper will help strengthen our network and its capacity to respond to biodiversity data needs both now and in the future.” and that he was proud of the contribution.

The Gaps That Remain

The same anniversary accounting is blunt about limits. Species-rich regions, particularly in the Global South, remain underrepresented in the record, while heavily worked, charismatic groups like birds carry more weight than less visible taxa. Many marine species and cryptic habitats are still inadequately documented. GBIF also indexes rather than vets every record, leaning on publishers to keep quality at the source and on users to flag problems, a distributed model built for scale but not friction-free. Under its 2023 to 2027 strategic framework the facility is pushing wider participation, deeper support for survey and monitoring data, and fuller integration of DNA-derived records, in 2026 adopting the Catalogue of Life for its taxonomic backbone. The original asymmetries, its own assessment concedes, cannot be resolved by the network alone; they hinge on global funding, data culture and capacity.

Sources

Get breaking stories first on our Telegram channel.

More stories by

Most read

Natural Disasters

Energy & Mining

Space

Science Discoveries